MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250215182 · doi:10.24124/2008/bpgub1369

Community referrals: the experiences of youth forensic mental health therapists in Prince George

2008· dissertation· en· W4250215182 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Elizabeth Broughton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumMental healthActive listeningPrivilege (computing)PsychologySocial workAdventureAgency (philosophy)Medical educationMedicineSociologyPsychiatryPsychotherapistPolitical scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services (YFPS) outpatient clinic in Prince George is the focus of this Master of Social Work practicum report. The following pages outline practicum learning goals and objectives and how goals and objectives were met. YFPS is described in detail including the mandate of the agency along with the clinical services provided by the clinic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.590
GPT teacher head0.649
Teacher spread0.059 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth Policy Implementation Science→French-language works237,207→