MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250254992 · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v20i4.2992

Teaching Western Political Thought Through Western Literature

2020· article· en· W4250254992 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaDialogical selfPoliticsIdeologySociologyUtopiaGender studiesGovernmentalityPower (physics)Privilege (computing)SubtextState (computer science)AestheticsHegemonyPolitical scienceEpistemologyLiteratureLawPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pedagogy involved in teaching courses in Political Theory through the text and subtext of Western literature requires a dialogical approach that engages students in commentary on contemporary political experiences. Using political theory as a form of civic engagement, students were engaged in discussions of political tropes and characters that are embedded in the tradition of Western literature. Themes that emerged include; the power of political will, the place of utopia and dystopia in imagined communities, the development of ideological bias in totalitarianism, indigeneity and identity politics, the state of nature and governmentality, the emergence of gender politics, black reality and white privilege, and conspicuous consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.018
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Higher Education Theory and PracticeSame topicPolitical theory and GramsciFrench-language works237,207