MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2016· article· W4250363921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark D. Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireFaithContext (archaeology)PoliticsBritish EmpireHistorySociologyLawAncient historyPolitical scienceTheologyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: An Anglican British World: The Church of England and the expansion of the settler empire, c. 1790–1860 by Joseph Hardwick, and: Mighty England Do Good: Culture, Faith, Empire, and World in the Foreign Missions of the Church of England, 1850–1915 by Steven S. Maughan Mark Chapman (bio) An Anglican British World: The Church of England and the expansion of the settler empire, c. 1790–1860, by Joseph Hardwick. pp. 304; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014, £75.00, $110.00. Mighty England Do Good: Culture, Faith, Empire, and World in the Foreign Missions of the Church of England, 1850–1915, by Steven S. Maughan; pp. xvi + 511. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014, $45.00. These volumes represent major contributions to the history of Anglican mission in the context of British imperialism. Broad in scope, both explore the complex religious, political, and cultural networks inside and outside England that drove Christian mission. Joseph Hardwick’s An Anglican British World: The Church of England and the expansion of the settler empire, c. 1790–1860 is concerned first and foremost with settlers and the clergy who served them. It will serve as a definitive study of the relationships between the Church of England and the early period of reform politics throughout the settler empire, most especially in Upper Canada, the Cape Colony, and New South Wales. Drawing on extensive archival work, Hardwick traces the networks of people and clergy across continents, outlining the many problems they faced in finance and broader support. He relates the issues on the ground in the different colonies to the supply of money and labor for the work of the Church in both England and Ireland. Bishops and others who might have enjoyed a particular prestige at home were forced to work with mission societies and voluntary communities upon whose support they relied. Furthermore, other relationships, such as that with the Indian church in South Africa or the American Episcopal Church in Canada, made the networks more complex. The complex methods used in clergy recruitment are exhaustively explored in chapter 1. These gradually developed over the period under discussion as the colonial authorities surrendered their control over appointments. At the beginning of the period there were often remarkably low standards among colonial clergy, although matters improved after educational institutions were provided for the training of a local clergy. Senior leaders tended to be appointed through domestic and colonial patronage networks. As the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel (SPG) came to be dominated by High Churchmen, there was greater potential for conflict between colonial governments and Bishops. In general, however, church leaders, even when they represented a church party, tended toward moderation: “the high churchmen who were influenced by Tractarianism preferred to build a popular and representative Church rather than a Tractarian one” (57). There were obvious issues over voluntarism and establishment, which were expressed differently in the different colonies, as well as over how far the Church of England could be seen as an international body co-extensive with the spread of Empire. As Bishops came to accept the voluntary nature of the Church as a spiritual institution, the colonial laity discussed in detail in chapter 2 came to assume great importance in shaping the churches. In this under-researched field, Hardwick painstakingly shows how lay networks were established in the colonial churches. He looks at finances, institutions, and church associations in the different colonies. As a voluntary association, the colonial church posed particular problems for those entrusted with authority. This fact emerges clearly in [End Page 173] chapter 3, where the Colonial Bishoprics’ Fund is discussed in detail. Missionary bishops very quickly found that they had to work with laity, as is revealed in the Episcopate of Robert Gray of Cape Town. Financing the settler churches also posed serious problems, as chapter 4 illustrates. Overall, Hardwick’s book is a major contribution to the history of the colonial church, which was conservative in that it tended towards loyalty and patriotism, while also paving the way for future reform as it was forced into laicisation. Nevertheless, Hardwick concludes that, even though they were voluntary associations, the churches continued to play a major role...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7400.726

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207