Klinischer Nutzen des e-ASPECTS-Score
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Die elektronische ASPECTS-Score-Software (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; e-ASPECTS) basiert auf Algorithmen und ermöglicht eine schnelle und standardisierte Analyse von CT-Aufnahmen. Nagel et al. untersuchten den klinischen Nutzen des e-ASPECTS-Score in einer Patientengruppe der ENCHANTED-Studie (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study). Fazit Die Studie bestätigt den klinischen Nutzen der e-ASPECTS-Software. Die manuelle Beurteilung der ischämischen Schädigung durch Radiologen erfordert Übung; daher gibt es eine große Variabilität hinsichtlich der ASPECTS-Bewertung. Der e-ASPECTS ermöglicht eine wenig voreingenommene und standardisierte Beurteilung des ASPECTS und kann sowohl für klinische Studien als auch für die klinische Praxis von Nutzen sein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.079 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".