MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250387051 · doi:10.5558/tfc81274-2

Tributes / Hommages

2005· article· it· W4250387051 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hardisty Sellers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2005
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ohn Sellers passed away at his home in Carleton Place, Ontario January 9, 2005 with his wife, Marilyn, at his side.John had suffered from a respiratory ailment for a number of years and had recently had a severe case of pneumonia that had him in hospital just before Christmas.A family service, with a few close friends in attendance, was held January 14 at St. James Anglican Church, followed by a celebration in the Parish Hall of John's life.In the words of the church group who catered the event, it was the largest assembly they had ever served.The words are an apt analogy for John's life and career.He was larger than life in many ways -a devoted family man, a caring and giving friend, a forester's forester, an avid dancer (square and round), an accomplished woodworker and turner, a devout member of the Anglican Church of Canada, an eager webmaster, a (sometimes frustrated) fisherman, an entrepreneur, a helping hand wherever and whenever it was needed.The list goes on, and John touched the lives of many, many people.After Grade 13 at North Toronto Collegiate, John entered the Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto in the fall of 1957.He was an above-average student and graduated with a B.Sc.F. in 1961.Shortly afterwards, he married Marilyn Davidge whom he had met in their teen years through the Bedford

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0320.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1240.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry Chronicle→Same topicAsian American and Pacific Histories→French-language works237,207→