Highly Diastereoselective Cascade [5+1] Double Michael Reaction, a Route for The Synthesis of Spiro Thio-Oxindoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The first diastereoselective synthesis of spiro-thiooxindole is reported via Michael reaction between thiooxindoles and divinyl ketones. The reaction was conducted without any catalyst or additive under green conditions, i.e., ethanol as the solvent and room temperature. This study showed the art of governing regioselectivity in which novel spiro frameworks were generated in high yields. In addition to simple and column chromatography-free purification, the high diastereoselectivity makes this protocol very robust. The regio- and stereo- selectivity of the reaction has been discussed in light of the theoretical calculations, and molecular docking has been performed on the reaction products. Our method presents the first synthesis of cis-spiro thiooxindoles, which can be used to generate cis-spiro oxindoles. According to our docking studies, the latter demonstrates higher binding affinities towards the LdUMPS than corresponding trans-spiro oxindoles and may be utilized to develop new hit compounds for leishmaniasis treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".