Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Roger A. Hall, Performing the American Frontier, 1870-1906, reviewed by Rosemarie K. Bank Susan Duffy, The Political Plays of Langston Hughes, reviewed by Joseph McLaren Robert F. Gross, ed., Tennessee Williams: A Casebook, reviewed by Philip C. Kolin Stephen J. Bottoms, Albee: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, reviewed by Christopher Bigsby Leslie Kane, ed., David Mamet in Conversation, reviewed by David Krasner Leslie Kane, Weasels and Wisemen: Ethics and Ethnicity in the Work of David Mamet, reviewed by David Krasner Gene A. Plunka, The Black Comedy of John Guare, reviewed by Tice L. Miller James Fisher, The Theater of Tony Kushner: Living Past Hope, reviewed by Mary L. Cutler Robert Baker White, The Text in Play: Representations of Rehearsal in Modem Drama, reviewed by Neil Blackadder Anne Bogart, A Director Prepares: Seven Essays on Art and Theatre, reviewed by Carrie Kathryn Lee Guillermo Gomez-Pena, Dangerous Border Crossers: The Artist Talks Back, reviewed by Frederick Luis Aldama.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.372 | 0.389 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".