MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250447984 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1_31

The Cruciform DNA Mobility Shift Assay: A Tool to Study Proteins that Recognize Bent DNA

2009· book-chapter· en· W4250447984 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Y. Stefanovsky, Tom Moss

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCruciformElectrophoretic mobility shift assayDNADNA-binding proteinHMG-boxBent molecular geometryDNA binding siteMolecular biologyBiophysicsBiologyComputational biologyChemistryGeneticsGeneTranscription factorMaterials sciencePromoterGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So-called architectural DNA binding proteins such as those of the HMGB-box family induce DNA bending and kinking. However, these proteins often display only a weak sequence preference, making the analysis of their DNA binding characteristics difficult if not impossible in a standard electrophoretic mobility assay (EMSA). In contrast, such proteins often bind prebent DNAs with high affinity and specificity. A synthetic cruciform DNA structure will often provide an ideal binding site for such proteins, allowing their affinities for both bent and linear DNAs to be directly and simply determined by a modified form of EMSA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207