MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250487407 · doi:10.4324/9781315036717-7

The Spanish–American War: Land Battles in Cuba, 1895–1898

2014· book-chapter· en· W4250487407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAncient historyHistoryGeographyPolitical scienceEconomic history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines Field-Marshal Montgomery's conduct of the 1944-45 North-West Europe campaign in the light of two interlinked influences: conducting a campaign in a way designed to maintain the morale of your own troops, and with great concern to avoid casualties. These influences respectively may be termed the maintenance of morale and casualty conservation. The chapter also examines Montgomery's operational conduct as Commander-in-Chief of the Anglo-Canadian 21st Army Group, which comprised 2nd British and 1st Canadian Armies. It describes the morale of 21st Army Group's forces during the campaign. Montgomery's operational method was encapsulated by his expression Colossal Crack. The chapter provides morale problems existed within Montgomery's command, but that his forces advanced into Germany with their morale still intact. By 1944, the British leadership realised that if Britain emerged after Germany's defeat with virtually no army, then Britain's say in post-war Europe would be diminished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207