MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250511778 · doi:10.3406/ahrf.2004.2708

Crise de l'État et nouvelles autorités : Les juntes lors de la guerre d'indépendance

2004· article· en· W4250511778 on OpenAlexaff
António Moliner Prada

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)HumanitiesState (computer science)Political scienceAmbivalenceOrder (exchange)SociologyArtComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antonio Moliner Prada, The Crisis of State and the New Authorities : the Juntas in the War of Independence The aim of this article is to review research conducted in recent years on the juntas in order to ascertain the state of the art. Reference to popular revolution is out of place since the people were left out of the juntas. But they cannot be analysed without looking at the popular uprising which preceded their establishment. It needs to be said at the outset how difficult it is to create an interpretative model describing the specific features of the different juntas. No simple linear scheme of explanation suffices. In spite of their ambivalence, the juntas served as the motor of change from the bottom up and the hub of action between the different social classes. In the collective imagination fostered by liberalism, the junta movement of 1808 symbolises the Spanish revolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207