The Half-order Energy Balance Equation, Part 1: The homogeneous HEBE and long memories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The original Budyko–Sellers type 1-D energy balance models (EBMs) consider the Earth system averaged over long times and applies the continuum mechanics heat equation. When these and the more phenomenological zero (horizontal) – dimensional box models are extended to include time varying anomalies, they have a key weakness: neither model explicitly nor realistically treats the surface radiative – conductive surface boundary condition that is necessary for a correct treatment of energy storage. In this first of a two part series, we apply standard Laplace and Fourier techniques to the continuum mechanics heat equation, solving it with the correct radiative – conductive BC's obtaining an equation directly for the surface temperature anomalies in terms of the anomalous forcing. Although classical, this equation is half – not integer – ordered: the Half - ordered Energy Balance Equation (HEBE). A quite general consequence is that although Newton's law of cooling holds, that the heat flux across surfaces is proportional to a half (not first) ordered derivative of the surface temperature. This implies that the surface heat flux has a long memory, that it depends on the entire previous history of the forcing, the relationship is no longer instantaneous. We then consider the case where the Earth is periodically forced. The classical case is diurnal heat forcing; we extend this to annual conductive – radiative forcing and show that the surface thermal impedance is a complex valued quantity equal to the (complex) climate sensitivity. Using a simple semi-empirical model, we show how this can account for the phase lag between the summer maximum forcing and maximum surface temperature Earth response. In part II, we extend all these results to spatially inhomogeneous forcing and to the full horizontally inhomogeneous problem with spatially varying specific heats, diffusivities, advection velocities, climate sensitivities. We consider the consequences for macroweather forecasting and climate projections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".