MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Trinity

2021· article· en· W4250554057 on OpenAlex
Richard Clutterbuck

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoctrineRevelationFaithTheologyWorshipExposition (narrative)PhilosophyConversationNarrativeLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standing Order 524 in the Constitutional Practice and Discipline of the Methodist Church in Britain states: ‘There is urgent need that the main doctrines of the Christian faith should be more plainly and systematically set forth in public preaching, so that the Methodist people may be established in the faith and better defended against error and uncertainty.’ Few readers of this journal would disagree. Nevertheless, it is not always easy to find material that bridges the gap between academic monographs on doctrinal theology (for example, the recent The Trinitarian Dimension of John Wesley's Theology by Elmer Colyer) and the preaching and conversation that needs to take place within a congregation.This book, part of The Wesleyan Theology Series, aims to fill this gap. It has the laudable goal of making a fundamental Christian doctrine accessible and credible for enquiring Christians, especially those who belong to the Wesleyan family of churches. Published by the Church of the Nazarene publishing house, it sets out the doctrine of the Trinity as central to the biblical account of the economy of salvation and essential for a proper understanding of Christian life and worship. The author is Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Point Loma Nazarene University, California, and has himself written a doctrinal monograph on creation and the Trinity.The bulk of this book is an exposition of a series of Christian doctrines (including revelation, creation, salvation, church, and eschatology) that, for Powell, are taught in a trinitarian way through the biblical narrative. This is followed by a much shorter section on the historical development of the doctrine of the Trinity (largely a summary account of the Nicene and Chalcedonian controversies) and then by an even shorter set of reflections under the title, ‘Thinking about the Trinity Today’.Clarity is a key theological virtue for Powell. He believes that the divine Trinity is no incomprehensible mystery; instead, the triune God is clearly revealed in the person of Christ and in the Bible as a whole. Of course, doctrine still uses fallible human words and is therefore limited. But God is, by God's very nature, knowable. The result is a book that would be helpful to preachers, teachers, and enquiring Christians, especially those who share the author's moderately conservative perspective. There are limited references to the works of John Wesley and to the place of the Trinity within the Wesleyan tradition. The final section, rather puzzlingly, focuses on the challenge of Pentecostalism and gifts of the Spirit.Clarity, though, comes at a cost. Powell's approach to doctrine comes close to what George Lindbeck has described as ‘cognitive propositionalism’, so in each section we are given a series of bullet points with proof texts from the Bible. This is not done in a sectarian or fundamentalist spirit, but it does ignore the multivocal and polysemic nature of scripture—something that would be helpful to acknowledge even in an introductory text. Second, while Powell is right that ‘mystery’ is a term capable of abuse as an excuse for not speaking clearly, he gives no hint of the apophatic tradition of Christian thought, with its insistence on the unknowable mystery at the heart of God. And, finally, although there are helpful sections on the Trinity in relation to worship and prayer, there is too little sense of how the human imagination has engaged with the doctrine in music, art, and literature. The result is a rather dry text that does not quite manage to convey the passion that its author obviously feels.In summary, here is a useful but limited book that illustrates both the need for accessible doctrinal theology, and why it is so difficult to produce it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it