MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Trinity

2021· article· en· W4250554057 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard Clutterbuck

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoctrineRevelationFaithTheologyWorshipExposition (narrative)PhilosophyConversationNarrativeLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standing Order 524 in the Constitutional Practice and Discipline of the Methodist Church in Britain states: ‘There is urgent need that the main doctrines of the Christian faith should be more plainly and systematically set forth in public preaching, so that the Methodist people may be established in the faith and better defended against error and uncertainty.’ Few readers of this journal would disagree. Nevertheless, it is not always easy to find material that bridges the gap between academic monographs on doctrinal theology (for example, the recent The Trinitarian Dimension of John Wesley's Theology by Elmer Colyer) and the preaching and conversation that needs to take place within a congregation.This book, part of The Wesleyan Theology Series, aims to fill this gap. It has the laudable goal of making a fundamental Christian doctrine accessible and credible for enquiring Christians, especially those who belong to the Wesleyan family of churches. Published by the Church of the Nazarene publishing house, it sets out the doctrine of the Trinity as central to the biblical account of the economy of salvation and essential for a proper understanding of Christian life and worship. The author is Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Point Loma Nazarene University, California, and has himself written a doctrinal monograph on creation and the Trinity.The bulk of this book is an exposition of a series of Christian doctrines (including revelation, creation, salvation, church, and eschatology) that, for Powell, are taught in a trinitarian way through the biblical narrative. This is followed by a much shorter section on the historical development of the doctrine of the Trinity (largely a summary account of the Nicene and Chalcedonian controversies) and then by an even shorter set of reflections under the title, ‘Thinking about the Trinity Today’.Clarity is a key theological virtue for Powell. He believes that the divine Trinity is no incomprehensible mystery; instead, the triune God is clearly revealed in the person of Christ and in the Bible as a whole. Of course, doctrine still uses fallible human words and is therefore limited. But God is, by God's very nature, knowable. The result is a book that would be helpful to preachers, teachers, and enquiring Christians, especially those who share the author's moderately conservative perspective. There are limited references to the works of John Wesley and to the place of the Trinity within the Wesleyan tradition. The final section, rather puzzlingly, focuses on the challenge of Pentecostalism and gifts of the Spirit.Clarity, though, comes at a cost. Powell's approach to doctrine comes close to what George Lindbeck has described as ‘cognitive propositionalism’, so in each section we are given a series of bullet points with proof texts from the Bible. This is not done in a sectarian or fundamentalist spirit, but it does ignore the multivocal and polysemic nature of scripture—something that would be helpful to acknowledge even in an introductory text. Second, while Powell is right that ‘mystery’ is a term capable of abuse as an excuse for not speaking clearly, he gives no hint of the apophatic tradition of Christian thought, with its insistence on the unknowable mystery at the heart of God. And, finally, although there are helpful sections on the Trinity in relation to worship and prayer, there is too little sense of how the human imagination has engaged with the doctrine in music, art, and literature. The result is a rather dry text that does not quite manage to convey the passion that its author obviously feels.In summary, here is a useful but limited book that illustrates both the need for accessible doctrinal theology, and why it is so difficult to produce it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207