MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250582128 · doi:10.1111/1541-0064.00028

Reviews / Comptes rendus

2003· article· fr· W4250582128 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kevin Hanna, Joseph Mensah, Valerie Preston, Mark W. Rosenberg, Frank Tough, David Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaYork UniversityQueen's UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)Art historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2130.195

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes→Same topicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs→French-language works237,207→