Bioaccessibility and antioxidant activities of finger millet food phenolics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finger millet flour was used to prepare five different foods using steaming, pressure cooking, dry roasting and open boiling as representative preparation methods. The soluble and bound phenolics of freeze dried foods were extracted. The gastric and intestinal bioaccessibility and potential absorption of phenolic compounds of foods were determined accommodating a simulated in vitro digestion model. The phenolic extracts of foods and supernatants collected at different stages of in vitro digestion were examined for their phenolic contents and antioxidant activities. The content of ferulic acid, of phenolic extracts of foods were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The open pan boiling retained higher content of phenolics and showed higher antioxidant activities compared to other food preparations. The release of phenolic compounds increased stepwise from gastric to intestinal phase for all foods and the bioaccessibility and potential absorption of phenolic compounds depended on the food preparation methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it