MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250646009 · doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70301-5

Clinical: Nonvariceal UGI Bleeding Tuesday, May 21, 2002

2002· article· en· W4250646009 on OpenAlexaff
M.L.P. Velthuijsen van, Ellen M. Vreeburg, Erik A. Rauws, A. A. M. Geraedts, Guido N.J. Tytgat, Sandrine Sabbah, Alan Barkun, Elham Rahme, Dalila Benhaberou-Brun, Naoki Chiba, Robert Enns, Richard Fedorak, Jamie Gregor, Raymond Lahaie, Jonathan Love, Norman E. Marcon, Rolf Sebaldt, A. Merighi, Lorenzo Camellini, Cristiano Pagnini, Francesco Azzolini, Stefano Guazzetti, A. Scarcelli, Federico Manenti, Gianpiero Rigo, Yasushi Asakura, Yukinori Imai, Shin Arai, Manabu Kinoshita, Toru Kakinuma, Kotaro Kakoi, Fumie Rai, Yuichiro Eguchi, Kenji Fujiwara, Shinichi Ota

Bibliographic record

VenueGastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Trauma and Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1420.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGastrointestinal EndoscopySame topicAbdominal Trauma and InjuriesFrench-language works237,207