MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250674631 · doi:10.3399/bjgp19x705689

Commissioning

2019· letter· en· W4250674631 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sami Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of General Practice · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDebreceni Egyetem
KeywordsMedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are grateful to Dr Judith Davidson and her team from Canada for their focus on this highly prevalent condition and for highlighting the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for insomnia within primary care. 1 Indeed, CBT is the treatment of choice according to clinical guidelines. A significant challenge however is how to deliver effective treatment at scale. Certainly within the NHS, where some 12 million prescriptions for sleeping pills are still written annually, it is difficult to imagine there being an adequate supply of clinical psychologists or trained therapists to deliver this CBT. Both logistical and financial barriers suggest that we must look to a more pragmatic and scalable solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of General PracticeSame topicHealthcare Systems and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207