MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250720254 · doi:10.1109/mmm.2008.929554

Space mapping

2008· article· en· W4250720254 on OpenAlexafffund
Sławomir Kozieł, Qingsha S. Cheng, J.W. Bandler

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave Magazine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetMcMaster University
KeywordsSpace mappingRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceSpace (punctuation)Microwave engineeringFilter (signal processing)MicrowaveMicrostripElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer visionElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we review state-of-the-art concepts of space mapping and place them con- textually into the history of design optimization and modeling of microwave circuits. We formulate a generic space-mapping optimization algorithm, explain it step-by-step using a simple microstrip filter example, and then demonstrate its robustness through the fast design of an interdigital filter. Selected topics of space mapping are discussed, including implicit space mapping, gradient-based space mapping, the optimal choice of surrogate model, and tuning space mapping. We consider the application of space mapping to the modeling of microwave structures. We also discuss a software package for automated space-mapping optimization that involves both electromagnetic (EM) and circuit simulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations325
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave MagazineSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207