MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250744049 · doi:10.1016/s1365-6937(14)70310-7

Mann+Hummel expands in Canada

2014· article· en· W4250744049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFiltration Industry Analyst · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering ethicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transverse cardiac-cycle gated high resolution magnetic resonance images have been obtained from the neck of the New Zealand white rabbit both in normal animals and from those in which a collar had been earlier positioned around one carotid artery. The study included animals fed on normal and on high cholesterol diets with the surgical modification having been demonstrated previously to cause a rapid and reproducible lesion resembling early atherosclerosis. The aim of the work was to investigate the attainable spatial resolution and sensitivity at a field strength of 2 T using a large radiofrequency transmitter system and a surface coil receiver with which spin-echo images have been obtained. Visualization was enhanced using a three-dimensional interpolation technique. An image resolution of 200 μm was readily obtained but was shown to be insufficient for delineating pathological features within the artery wall such as intimal layer thickening. The results have been compared with histopathological finding which confirmed that any morphological changes were within the pixel resolution of the image. Extensions to the methodology are proposed which should be able to detect atherosclerotic changes with a resolution of 50 μm within a feasible imaging time. In addition, the MRI study of how the surgical intervention alters the artery shape and curvature was carried out and the MRI demonstrated that collar implantation in general does not occlude the artery and causes only a slight and gradual degree of curvature to the vessel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiltration Industry AnalystSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207