MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250762656 · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3028636

Proceedings of the IEEE publication information

2020· article· en· W4250762656 on OpenAlexaff
D.J. Allstot, Moeness G. Amin, Göran Andersson, Ronald Arkin, John Baillieul, Claudio A. Cañizares, Gert Cauwenberghs, Jocelyn Chanussot, Hsiao‐Hwa Chen, Diane J. Cook, Jack Dongarra, John S. Duncan, Michael Fang, Georges Gielen, Maya Gokhale, Christofer Hierold, Pramod P. Khargonekar, Agnieszka Konczykowska, Khaled B. Letaief, Mrozowski Damir, Novosel Vincent, Catherine Rosenberg, Robert Schober, Ioannis Stavrakakis, Manos M. Tentzeris, Isabel Trancoso, Rod Tucker, Eddie Tunstel, Jan Van Impe, Der Spiegel, Hoi-Jun Yoo, C Patrick, Stephen Welby, Cherif Amirat, Chris Brantley, Steven Heffner, Karen Hawkins, Donna Hourican, Dawn Melley, Kevin Lisankie, Peter Tuohy, Jeffrey Cichocki, Neelam Khinvasara, Tapan K. Sarkar, John Verboncoeur, Vice Chair, Hülya Kırkıcı, Michael Förster, A Sergio, Katherine Du, Stefano Duncan, Lorena Galli, Ron Garcia, Roberto Goldfarb, Lawrence Graglia, Ekram Hall, W Hossain, Karl Clem, Kirkici Hulya, Paolo Fabrizio, Lloyd Montuschi, Sundaram Morley, Annette Ramesh, Sorel Reilly, Manfred Reisman, Gianluca Schindler, Gaurav Setti, Sharad Sharma, Ljiljana Sinha, Maria Trajkovic, John Elena Valcher, Wai-Choong Vig, Forrest Wong, Steve Wright, Bin Yurkovich, Cecelia Zhao, Konstantinos Karachalios, Sophia Muirhead, Jamie Moesch, Thomas Siegert, Mary Ward-Callan, Vaishali Damle, Jun Sun, Patrick Kempf, Joanna Gojlik

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the IEEE · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6230.578

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the IEEESame topicInternet of Things and AIFrench-language works237,207