Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents three frameworks of human action recognition to facilitate better recognition performance. The first framework fuses handcrafted features from four different modalities including RGB, depth, skeleton, and accelerometer data. In addition, a new descriptor for skeleton data is proposed that provides a discriminative representation for the poses of an action. Since the goal of the first framework is to find a more discriminative subspace, a generalized fusion technique Multimodal Hybrid Centroid Canonical Correlation Analysis (MHCCCA) is proposed for two or more sets of features or modalities. The second framework fuses handcrafted and deep learning features from three modalities including RGB, depth, and skeleton. In this framework a new depth representation is introduced that extracts the final representation using Deep ConvNet. The proposed fusion technique forms the backbone of the framework: Multiset Globality Locality Preserving Canonical Correlation Analysis (MGLPCCA) for two or more sets of features or modalities. MGLPCCA aims to preserve the local and global structures of data while maximizing the correlation among different modalities or sets. The third framework uses the deep learning techniques to improve the long term temporal modelling through two proposed techniques: Temporal Relational Network (TRN) and Temporal Second Order Pooling Based Network (T-SOPN). Additionally, Global-Local Network (GLN) and Fuse-Inception Network (FIN) are proposed to encourage the network to learn complementary information about the action and scene itself. Qualitative and quantitative experiments are conducted on nine different datasets demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed framework over state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".