MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250769112 · doi:10.1163/2031356x-02802005

Améliorer la compétitivité du bois de sciage légal en provenance de la zone agroforestière au Cameroun

2015· article· fr· W4250769112 on OpenAlexaff
Romain Kana, Norbert Sonne, Barthelemy Ondua, Patrick Tadjo, Benjamin Ondo

Bibliographic record

VenueAVRUG-bulletin/Afrika Focus · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis 1997, année d’attribution de la première forêt communautaire au Cameroun, le bois de sciage artisanal, issu des forêts communautaires, a du mal à trouver de la place dans le marché domestique pourtant en pleine expansion. La faible compétitivité de l’offre des forêts communautaires est un des freins importants pour la réduction de la pauvreté en milieu rural telle que souhaitée dans les nouvelles politiques forestières en Afrique Centrale. Le présent article, issu des travaux d’une équipe du Fonds Mondial pour la Nature et des structures partenaires, met en évidence les facteurs explicatifs de la faible compétitivité des forêts communautaires sur le marché domestique et propose en guise de conclusions, quelques stratégies dont la mise en oeuvre permettra à la foresterie communautaire de jouer pleinement son rôle dans l’approvisionnement des marchés domestiques, la gestion durable des ressources agroforestières et la réduction de la pauvreté en milieu rural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAVRUG-bulletin/Afrika FocusSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207