MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250773765 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db197660

Falling oil prices will offset rising US dollar

2015· other· en· W4250773765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarEconomicsEarningsNonStopMonetary economicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Two shocks are hitting the US economy at the same time: a sharp drop in the price of oil and a rise in the value of the dollar. The impact of the drop in oil is different from previous cycles due to the large expansion in US oil production; there will be a benefit to consumers of oil but a drop in capital expenditures on oil exploration and production. The rise in the dollar has already begun to hurt corporate profits, as overseas earnings decline. Impacts Larger automobiles will be favoured by consumers as gasoline remains low, but will be a drag on finances if oil prices rise. Overseas earnings are less likely to be repatriated, leading to more calls for a tax 'amnesty' on such profits. The debate over Keystone XL may intensify, as Canadian producers become more invested in reducing transportation costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207