Absorbing boundary conditions in quantum relativistic mechanics for spineless particles subject to a classical electromagnetic field
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he th eory o f A rtific ia l B oundary C onditions described by A n to in e et al. We begin b y p rovid ing definitions for a basic understanding o f the th eory of operators, d iffe re n tia l geom etry and wave fro n t sets needed to discuss the fa cto riza tio n theorem thanks to N irenberg and H orm ander The laser-free K lein -G ordon equation in 1-D is th e n dis cussed, followed by the case in clu d in g electrodynam ics potentials, concluding w ith the K G equation in 2-D space w ith electrodynam ics potentials. We then consider nu m erical sim ulations of the laser-particle K G equation, w hich includes a b rie f analysis o f a fin ite difference scheme. T he conclusion integrates a discussion o f the num eri cal results, the successful com pletion of the objective set fo rth , a declaration o f the unanswered encountered questions and a suggestion of subjects for fu rth e r research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it