MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250788786 · doi:10.24124/2018/58885

Forecasting spring freshet events in the Kiskatinaw River basin, British Columbia

2018· dissertation· en· W4250788786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hunter E. Gleason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowSpring (device)Environmental scienceSurface runoffPredictabilityHydrology (agriculture)PopulationWater yearClimatologyPrecipitationClimate changeDrainage basinGeographyMeteorologyGeologyCartographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incorporating climate information into hydrologic streamflow forecasts has allowed for significant advancement in the ability to predict seasonal streamflow. The City of Dawson Creek (CDC), BC, has depended on the Kiskatinaw River (KR) as its sole source of municipal water for over 60 years. Hydro-meteorological changes in the KR along with increasing population and growing industry have put stress on the CDC water supply. In this study regional surface climate observations aggregated over the winter accumulation period (15 November–25 March) integrated with global circulation indices were input into a series of regression models providing spring runoff predictions in the KR. The surface climate observations, indices of global circulation and snow cover provided good predictability of both cumulative streamflow timing and volume in the KR. This study provides the CDC with a tool for better informed releases and withdrawals from the KR during the spring freshet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→