MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250801384 · doi:10.4000/ifha.7557

Helmut Neuhaus, Karl Hegels Gedenkbuch. Lebenschronik eines Gelehrten des 19. Jahrhunderts

2013· article· fr· W4250801384 on OpenAlexaff
Élisabeth Grimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Historical Thought
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karl Hegel , fils du célèbre philosophe Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, est l'un des historiens allemands les plus importants de son temps, vécu presque tout le XIX e siècle et ses développements politiques, sociaux et économiques bouleversants, dont il était non seulement un fin observateur mais également un contemporain engagé.Professeur à Rostock, puis à Erlangen, et membre de diverses sociétés d'histoire, il s'appliqua à sortir de l'ombre de son père et se fit un nom en tant que spécialiste de l'histoire urbaine, notamment par l'édition des 27 premiers tomes des Chroniken der deutschen Städte ainsi que d'autres publications sur ce sujet.Il occupa à plusieurs reprises des hautes fonctions dans l'université et se battit, dans le cadre de son enseignement à Erlangen, pour la réforme des études d'histoire et la création d'un séminaire historique.Son engagement ne se limita toutefois pas au domaine académique mais toucha aussi, quoique de manière plus sporadique, le domaine politique à proprement parler, où il défendit la monarchie constitutionnelle et la solution petite-allemande.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207