Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "Editorial Board", Advances in Management Accounting (Advances in Management Accounting, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. ix. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2013)0000022003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Jacob G. Birnberg University of Pittsburgh, USA Germain B. Boer Vanderbilt University, USA Adriana Rejc Buhovac University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Donald K. Clancy Texas Tech University, USA Srikant M. Datar Harvard University, USA Antonio Dávila University of Navarra, Spain Alan S. Dunk University of Canberra, Australia Nabil S. Elias University of North Carolina, Charlotte, USA Kenneth J. Euske Naval Postgraduate School, USA Eric G. Flamholtz University of California, Los Angeles, USA George J. Foster Stanford University, USA Eli M. Goldratt Avraham Y. Goldratt Institute, USA John Innes University of Dundee, UK Larry N. Killough Virginia Polytechnic Institute, USA Carol J. McNair U.S. Coast Guard Academy, USA Neale O’Connor University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong James M. Reeve University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA Karen L. Sedatole Michigan State University, USA Lourdes White University of Baltimore, USA Sally K. Widener Rice University, USA Marc Wouters University of Twente, The Netherlands Book Chapters Advances in Management Accounting Advances in Management Accounting Advances in Management Accounting Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Board Statement of purpose and Review Procedures Editorial Policy and Manuscript form Guidelines Introduction The Impact of Firm Size on the Productivity of Resources Transfer of Performance Measurement System Innovations Across Economic Sectors The Effect of Personality Traits and Fairness on Honesty in Managerial Reporting The Adoption of Lean Operations and Lean Accounting on the Profitability and Cash Flows of Publicly Traded Companies Governance and Management Accounting: A Case of Board Governance in Ontario’s Hospital Sector Target Costing in the Presence of Product and Production Interdependencies Cost Accounting and Simulation: Toward a Post-Structuralist Understanding Input-Based Performance Evaluation, Incentive Intensity, and Proactive Work Behavior An Experimental Examination of the Combined Effects of Normative and Instrumental Commitments on Budgetary Slack Creation: Comparing Individuals versus Group Members
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.089 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".