MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250860315 · doi:10.5539/hes.v8n3p113

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3

2018· article· en· W4250860315 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sherry Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher Education Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceStrategic studiesHigher educationUniversity educationSociologyOpen universityMedia studiesDistance educationPolitical sciencePedagogyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Higher Education Studies wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal are greatly appreciated.Higher Education Studies is recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please find the application form and details at http://recruitment.ccsenet.org and e-mail the completed application form to hes@ccsenet.org.Reviewers for Volume 8, Number 3Ana-Cornelia Badea, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, RomaniaAntonina Lukenchuk, National Louis University, USAArbabisarjou Azizollah, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, IranAusra Kazlauskiene, Siauliai University, LithuaniaÇelebi Uluyol, Gazi University, Turkey, TurkeyDonna Harp Ziegenfuss, The University of Utah, USADonna.Smith, The Open University, UKFirouzeh Sepehrian Azar, Orumieh University, IranGerard Hoyne, School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, AustraliaGregory S. Ching, Fu Jen Catholic University, TaiwanHermes Loschi, University of Campinas, Braziljames badger, University of North Georgia, USAJisun Jung, University of Hong Kong, Hong KongJohn Cowan, Edinburgh Napier University, United KingdomJohn Lenon Ednave Agatep, AMA Computer College, PhilippinesLaid Fekih, University of Tlemcen Algeria, AlgeriaMichael John Maxel Okoche, Uganda Management Institute, UgandaNajia Sabir, Indiana University Bloomington, USANicos Souleles, Cyprus University of Technology, CyprusQing Xie, Jiangnan University, ChinaRanjit Kaur Gurdial Singh, The Kilmore International School, AustraliaSakiru Abiodun, Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education, NigeriaSandhya Rao Mehta, Sultan Qaboos University, IndiaSavitri Bevinakoppa, Melbourne Institute of Technology, AustraliaTeguh Budiharso, Center of Language and Culture Studies, IndonesiaVasiliki Brinia, Athens University of Economic and Business, GreeceYi Luo, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, USA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.080
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.546
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0800.546
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0150.009
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher Education StudiesSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207