MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250864995 · doi:10.5194/essdd-5-781-2012

Surface Ocean CO <sub>2</sub> Atlas (SOCAT) gridded data products

2012· preprint· en· W4250864995 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher L. Sabine, S. Hankin, H. Koyuk, Dorothée C. E. Bakker, Benjamin Pfeil, Are Olsen, Nicolas Metzl, A. Kozyr, Andrea J. Fassbender, A. Manke, Jeremy Malczyk, John Akl, Simone R. Alin, R. G. J. Bellerby, Alberto Borges, Jacqueline Boutin, Peter J. Brown, Wei‐Jun Cai, Francisco P. Chávez, A. Chen, Catherine E Cosca, Richard A. Feely, Melchor González‐Dávila, Catherine Goyet, Nick J. Hardman‐Mountford, Christoph Heinze, Mario Hoppema, Christopher W Hunt, D.J. Hydes, Masao Ishii, Truls Johannessen, Robert M. Key, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, A. Lourantou, Liliane Merlivat, Takashi Midorikawa, L. Mintrop, Chihiro Miyazaki, Akihiko Murata, Akira Nakadate, Y. Nakano, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Yukihiro Nojiri, Abdirahman M Omar, X. A. Padín, G.-H. Park, K. Paterson, Fı́z F. Pérez, Denis Pierrot, Alain Poisson, Aida F. Rı́os, J. Salisbury, J. Magdalena Santana‐Casiano, V. V. S. S. Sarma, Reiner Schlitzer, Birgit Schneider, Ute Schuster, Rainer Sieger, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, T. Suzuki, Taro Takahashi, Kathy Tedesco, Maciej Telszewski, Helmuth Thomas, Bronte Tilbrook, Doug Vandemark, Tony Veness, Andrew Watson, Ray F. Weiss, C. S. Wong, Hisayuki Yoshikawa‐Inoue

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Acidification Effects and Responses
Canadian institutionsNorth Pacific Marine Science OrganizationDalhousie University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryBjerknessenteret for klimaforskning, Universitetet i BergenUniversitetet i BergenCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationDalhousie UniversityNatural Environment Research CouncilNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyEuropean CommissionUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of WashingtonNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSea surface temperatureEnvironmental scienceProduct (mathematics)MeteorologyData setInterpolation (computer graphics)ClimatologyComputer scienceOceanographyGeographyGeologyMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. A well documented, publicly available, global data set for surface ocean carbon dioxide (CO2) parameters has been called for by international groups for nearly two decades. The Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) project was initiated by the international marine carbon science community in 2007 with the aim of providing a comprehensive, publicly available, regularly updated, global data set of marine surface CO2, which had been subject to quality control (QC). SOCAT version 1.5 was made public in September 2011 and holds 6.3 million quality controlled surface CO2 data from the global oceans and coastal seas, spanning four decades (1968–2007). The SOCAT gridded data is the second data product to come from the SOCAT project. Recognizing that some groups may have trouble working with millions of measurements, the SOCAT gridded product was generated to provide a robust regularly spaced fCO2 product with minimal spatial and temporal interpolation which should be easier to work with for many applications. Gridded SOCAT is rich with information that has not been fully explored yet, but also contains biases and limitations that the user needs to recognize and address.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOcean Acidification Effects and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207