MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250885762 · doi:10.54640/cah.2009.5

Ökologie des Jungpaleolithikums (Ungarische Angaben)

2009· article· de· W4250885762 on OpenAlex
Viola T. Dobosi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die Einteilung des Jungpaläolithikums au f chronologischer Basis (frühes, mittleres, und spätes Jungpaläolithikum) ist der entsprechende Rahmen zur Gruppierung der heimischen Kulturen. Das Friihjungpaläolithikum wird durch den Frühabschnitt der Szeletien-Kultur und das Aurignacien vertreten. Das Mitteljungpaläolilhikum vertreten den heutigen Kenntnissen nach zwei Kulturen. Der entwickelte Abschnitt der Szeletien-Kultur mit den Blattspitzen und die erste Siedlungswelle der Gravettien-Entität. Die Kulturen des Spätjungpaläolithikums sind das Ságvárien und das ebenfalls auf zwei chronologischen Niveaus erscheinende Epigravettien. Von der unbelebten Umwelt untersuchen wir die orografischenUmstände, die Charakteristiken der die Funde einbettenden Sedimente, die Rohstoffquellen des Steinwerkzeugs und die auf der Ausnutzung topografischer Gegebenheiten beruhende Siedlungsstrategie. Unter den Faktoren der belebtenUmwelt wurde die größte Betonung au f die Jagdbeute gelegt, die die Selektierung des Menschen spiegelt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.015
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it