MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250890309 · doi:10.1504/ijlcpe.2019.100340

Structural damage identification of steel-concrete composite bridge under temperature effects based on cuckoo search

2019· article· en· W4250890309 on OpenAlexaff
Minshui Huang, Shaoxi Cheng, Hailin Lu, Mustafa Gül, Haiyang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Lifecycle Performance Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringCuckoo searchFinite element methodVibrationDisplacement (psychology)Identification (biology)Composite numberMode (computer interface)Materials scienceMATLABComputer scienceEngineeringComposite materialAcousticsAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Civil structures are generally exposed to varying temperature conditions. Temperature variations in structural components not only cause quasi-static responses like displacement and stress, but also lead to changes in vibration features, such as frequencies and mode shapes. Damage identification is usually based on the vibration characteristics, which is easily affected by temperature. This means that the accuracy of identification is not guaranteed without considering the temperature effects. In the paper, temperature is considered as a variable in material properties, and the finite element model of I-40 steel-concrete composite bridge is established based on MATLAB platforms in order to figure out its vibration features. Then cuckoo search (CS) is introduced to damage identification under temperature variations. It is shown that cuckoo search is able to distinguish experimental structure damages from temperature variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Lifecycle Performance EngineeringSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207