MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Patriarchy

2017· other· en· W4250964011 on OpenAlexaff
Alison L. Bain, Hülya Arik

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Encyclopedia of Geography · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatriarchyScholarshipGender studiesSociologyAgency (philosophy)FeminismOppressionPrivilege (computing)PostmodernismMasculinityPower (physics)EssentialismFemininityPoliticsPolitical scienceEpistemologySocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patriarchy is a concept originally deployed by Western, radical, second‐wave feminists to describe social structures governed by hierarchical power relations that privilege masculinity over femininity, and permit the domination, oppression, and exploitation of women by men. Such scholarship was critiqued, particularly by women of color, for producing ahistorical and acultural generalizations that overlook nuances and variations in power relations; however, anti‐essentialist poststructuralist and postmodern approaches to feminism have complicated understandings of gender and foregrounded the agency of women to bargain with patriarchy. Feminist geographical scholarship on patriarchy reveals how it is entangled in bodily and spatial ways with the historical, transterritorial, and transnational processes and particularities of capitalism and colonialism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Encyclopedia of GeographySame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207