British Association for Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology (BAPO) abstracts from meeting on 8 October 2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
generating a '(2f1-f2) DPOAE' of -10dBSPL provided an isoDP measure of sensitivity.Aminoglycoside exposure in the CF group was obtained by inspection of clinical notes: median number of courses 7; median dosage 38 g; plasma levels within normal limits.Data were analysed by t-test. ResultsBoth groups were comparable by age and sex distribution.All mean values of -10dBSPL isoDP were elevated by 2-7 dB SPL in the CF group.This elevation reached significance (p < 0.001) at 4 kHz in the left ear. ConclusionsThese changes provide some evidence of an early effect of aminoglycoside on cochlear OHC function preceding changes in the PTA.This may provide a further objective measure for the clinician for monitoring the onset of any ototoxic effects.Interestingly in this group of paediatric CF patients, in spite of the repeated exposure, there was no evidence of frank aminoglycoside ototoxicity.This suggests that the risk of aminoglycoside ototoxicity in CF patients may be lower than that reported for non-CF patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.220 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".