MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251005892 · doi:10.1177/089431840201500106

Practice Applications

2002· article· en· W4251005892 on OpenAlexaff
Gail J. Mitchell, Laurie Jensen-Wunder, Maria Rizalina M. Gantalao, Janene K. Papendick

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Science Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing practiceNursing theoryNursingClinical PracticeNursing researchPsychologyHealth careWork (physics)Medical educationMedicineMEDLINEPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This practice column features the works of three graduate nursing students who developed community practice models during their studies at Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The nurses worked in communities with Native Americans, older persons in long-term care, and persons struggling with limited resources. Each of the nurses developed a practice model consistent with the human becoming nursing theory, and each shows here how nursing practice is different from traditional nursing care when it is guided by a knowledge base consistent with the human science paradigm. The work described in the column contributes to understanding nursing as a discipline with a practice that makes meaningful contributions to human health and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing Science QuarterlySame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207