A Gentleman's War? The Diary of Captain Albert Horace Brown of SS Huntsman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activities of the Third Reich's surface raiders have attracted relatively little attention because overall they were not very successful in sinking Allied merchant shipping compared with aircraft or U-boats. It may be argued, of course, that the German "fleet in being" policy restricted the captains of Kriegsmarine surface raiders so that they were unlikely to find the richest pickings. Instructed to avoid action with British naval forces, even markedly inferior ones, they were scarcely in a position routinely to attack large convoys.' But there were two main reasons for those instructions. First, there was the obvious one that as long as the raiders were roaming the oceans, the Royal Navy (RN) had to make disproportionately expensive efforts to find them. Second, and almost as obvious, was the fact that German vessels could not risk serious damage due to the lack of repair facilities, especially in distant waters. When the cruisers Exeter, Ajax and Achilles (New Zealand Division) engaged Admiral Graf Spee, Commodore Henry Harwood did so knowing that if his ships suffered damage they could limp off to the Falkland Islands for repair, while his opponent had to face a longer and more hazardous limp back to Germany, since the dockyard at Brest was not yet available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".