MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vertebral artery fibromuscular dysplasia: an unusual cause of stroke in a 3‐year‐old child

2003· article· en· W4251058636 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Camacho, Alberto Villarejo‐Galende, T. Moreno, Rogelio Simón, Alberto Múñoz, Fernando Mateos

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibromuscular dysplasiaMedicineStroke (engine)Vertebral arteryBasilar arteryAngiographyThrombosisCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyRenal artery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a systemic arteriopathy which tends to affect renal arteries followed by cervicocranial vessels. It can lead to cerebral infarction if cephalic arteries are involved. FMD is an unusual cause of stroke in childhood that generally affects the carotid area. Only four cases of vertebral FMD and subsequent stroke have been reported previously and we present the youngest patient of all. A healthy 3‐year‐old female was admitted to Hospital Doce de Octubre in Madrid, Spain with cerebellar infarction. Angiography disclosed basilar artery thrombosis and typical signs of FMD in both vertebral arteries. No other angiographic alteration was noted in the other vessels studied. Her phenotype and other investigations were unremarkable. The patient was treated with anti‐aggregation therapy (aspirin) and the outcome was excellent. Investigation of the occurrence in childhood of this kind of arteriopathy may lead to clarification of its natural history and speculation about its unclear pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Medicine & Child NeurologySame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207