MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251079206 · doi:10.4000/rfsic.10681

Liste des relecteurs·trices du n° 21

2021· article· fr· W4251079206 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Françoise BERNARD, Université Aix-Marseille Dominique BESSIERES, Université Rennes 2 Anne BEYAERT-GESLIN, Université Bordeaux Montaigne Jean-Jacques BOUTAUD, Université de Bourgogne Brigitte CHAPELAIN, Université Paris 13 François COOREN, Université de Montréal Anne CORDIER, Université de Rouen Nicole D’ALMEIDA, CELSA Paris-IV Sorbonne Delphine DUPRE, Université Bordeaux Montaigne Béatrice FLEURY, Université de Lorraine Alain KIYINDOU, Université Bordeaux Montaigne Vincent LIQUETE, Universit...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communicationSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207