Corticosteroid actions from neuronal membrane to behavior: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying rapid behavioral effects of corticosterone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigation of the rapid suppression of male courtship clasping behavior by corticosterone in roughskin newts (Taricha granulosa) has led to the identification of a specific neuronal membrane receptor for this stress steroid. This paper describes studies of the neurophysiological effects of the rapid, membrane receptor mediated action of corticosterone on neurons that are involved in the control of clasping. In freely behaving newts, medullary neurons, including reticulospinal neurons, process clasp-triggering sensory signals and participate in control of clasping movements. Corticosterone injection causes these brainstem neurons to show selective depression of clasping-related sensorimotor function. These corticosterone effects appear in 3-10 min and are closely associated with the simultaneous depression of clasping. In addition to these functionally specific effects, corticosterone simultaneously causes widespread, primarily depressive effects on neuronal activity and excitability in the medulla and elsewhere in the brain. Thus, the membrane actions of corticosterone lead to diverse neural effects, including changes in membrane excitability as well as specific, network-level actions that are apparent only during behavior. These rapid corticosterone effects strongly interact with actions of the neuropeptides vasotocin and corticotropin-releasing factor, such that the form and magnitude of the steroid's effects depend on the prevailing neuroendocrine state of the brain.Key words: glucocorticoid, membrane receptor, non-genomic, amphibian, reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".