MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251135424 · doi:10.14740/jmc2198w

A Young Woman With Spontaneous Hemothorax

2015· article· en· W4251135424 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Şükrü Gürbüz, Irfan Bayhan, Muhammet Gökhan Turtay, Hakkı Ulutaş, Zeynep Ayfer Aytemur

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemothoraxChest painCracklesPleural effusionAtelectasisTachypneaSurgeryThoracoscopyLungThorax (insect anatomy)RadiologyARDSHemopneumothoraxCardiologyPneumothoraxInternal medicineTachycardia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spontaneous hemothorax is defined as blood aggregation due to non-traumatic causes. Pulmonary pathologies, pleural pathologies, lung tumors, stomach pathologies, blood dyscrasia and non-pulmonary intrathoracic pathologies could be the causes of spontaneous hemothorax. It could be widely seen in young ages (average 22.1 and 34.0 years) and often depends on pleural pathologies. A 17-year-old female patient consulted with the complaints of chest pain on the left side and dyspnea. She did not have tachypnea and tachycardia. In the lung exam, there was no rhonchi but there was crackles. Other system exams were normal. Lung graph findings were compatible with left unilateral hemothorax. In computerized tomography, it was found that there were obvious pleural liquids with the depth of 5.5 cm on the left hemothorax and there were atelectasis in some areas. It was learnt that the patient did not have any diagnosed disease previously, did not use any drugs, did not complain with hemoptysis, and did not have fever in that time. In addition, her family did not have illness and myocardium infarction. Under the consideration of these circumstances, patient was treated to thoracic medicine services with catheter thoracostomy. With expansion deficiency and inappropriate drainage, the patient was implemented left video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), pleural biopsy and pleural drainage. In her VATS report, there were pleural liquids, minimal parenchymal units were seperated, thorax was small and diaphragm was elevated and no substantial pleural and parancimal pathologies were not defined. The sample which was taken from the pleural biopsy was fibrinous ploritis and it was compatible with common fresh bleeding. Cytologic findings were compatible chronic inflammatory reaction. Treatment of spontaneous hemothorax differs because of the etiology and in most cases tube thoracostomy could not be enough. Recently, VATS has become popular. In this case, VATS and tube thoracostomy were deployed. In conclusion, hemothorax is an urgent situation which has to be diagnosed immediately. Awareness of causes is highly helpful to diagnose. Even though it is rarely seen in the patients with chest pain and dyspnea, spontaneous hemothorax has to be considered. Treatment methods have to be decided up to vital indications and tube thoracostomy has to be implemented. In the elective situations in which drainage could not be used, VATS would be thought as an alternative option. J Med Cases. 2015;6(8):333-335 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2198w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesFrench-language works237,207