MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251171526 · doi:10.1002/9781119230793.ch1

General Aspects of Thermodynamics

2017· other· en· W4251171526 on OpenAlexaff
İbrahim Dinçer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirst law of thermodynamicsThermodynamicsSecond law of thermodynamicsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsLaws of thermodynamicsExergyOn the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous SubstancesWork (physics)Thermodynamic equationsThermodynamic systemFundamental thermodynamic relationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter primarily focuses on general aspects of thermodynamics, ranging from dimensions and units to psychrometric processes. It specifically discusses systems of units, thermodynamic systems, thermodynamic laws, pure substances, ideal and real gases, refrigerators and heat pumps, Carmot cycles, and psychrometrics and its processes. The chapter presents lots of examples to show how to utilize thermodynamic tools, particularly balance equations, for design, analysis, and assessment. The first and second laws of thermodynamics are the most common tools in practice due to the fact that transfers and conversions of energy are governed by these two laws. The first law of thermodynamics (FLT) is the energy-conservation principle. The second law of thermodynamics (SLT) refers to the inefficiencies of practical thermodynamic systems and indicates that it is impossible to have 100% efficiency in heat to work conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207