Constructal Design Applied to the Geometric Evaluation of a T-Shaped Earth-Air Heat Exchanger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Earth-Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) is a device that consists of one or more buried ducts through which air is forced to flow. The surrounding soil is responsible for enabling thermal exchanges along with the installation, making the temperature at the outlet milder than the inlet. The objective of this work is to ally a numerical-analytical approach with the Constructal Design method and Exhaustive Search technique to minimize the soil volume occupation (V), minimize the air flow pressure drop (PD), and maximize the thermal potential (TP) of a T-shaped EAHE. Starting from a conventional EAHE composed of a straight duct, called Reference Installation (RI), two degrees of freedom (DOF) were considered: the ratio between the length of the bifurcated branch and the length of the main branch (L1/L0) and the ratio between the diameter of the bifurcated branch and the diameter of the main branch (D1/D0). Comparing with RI, different T-shaped EAHE geometries were identified to reduce V by 23% and PD by 62% and to increase TP by 21%; and when these three performance parameters were concomitantly considered another T-shaped EAHE geometric configuration allowed to reach an improvement of around 27% when compared with the RI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".