MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Consensus</i>

2012· other· en· W4251220923 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Schermaier, Helge Dedek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient History · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical Ethics and Theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)RhetoricFoundation (evidence)Term (time)EpistemologyPoliticsPolitical scienceConsensus conferenceSociologyLaw and economicsLawPhilosophyMathematical economicsLinguisticsComputer scienceMathematicsLibrary sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The termconsensussignifies, just as in modern English, agreement: something that is “felt together.” In expressing a harmony between different parts of a larger structure,consensusis close toconcordia. The termconsensusis frequently used in political rhetoric; the concept of agreement is also the foundation of the classical law of contract as developed by the Praetor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient HistorySame topicPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryFrench-language works237,207