Recherches émergentes en communication des organisations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce dossier consacré aux recherches émergentes en communication des organisations, nous donnons la parole à un collectif international de chercheurs (France, Belgique, Canada.) Responsables d’équipes de recherche, chercheurs réputés, invités en raison de leur engagement à nos côtés depuis deux décennies, leurs contributions poursuivent les débats engagés à l’occasion du Symposium organisé à Bordeaux le 19 mars 2013 pour célébrer les vingt ans de la revue Communication & Organisation. On jugera de la diversité, mais également de la complémentarité de ces apports scientifiques qui font écho à la publication, en février 2013, aux Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, d’un Abécédaire, lequel retrace l’aventure éditoriale de notre revue… [En savoir +]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it