MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251280955 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db218647

Price and politics will pressure Canada’s oil sands

2017· other· en· W4251280955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarOil sandsCrude oilInvestment (military)Oil shaleEconomicsPipeline transportNatural resource economicsEconomyCommodityPoliticsBusinessMarket economyFinancePetroleum engineeringEngineeringPolitical scienceWaste managementGeographyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Output from Canada’s oil sands is on the rise thanks to large investments made over the last decade. However, the extended price downturn has many companies rethinking their oil sands business, and the outlook for the next decade has dimmed. Oil prices in the 50-dollar range and the emergence of the US shale industry have undercut the economics of producing Alberta’s costly heavy oil reserves. Impacts Alberta’s oil-dependent economy could continue to struggle in the coming years as investment drops, putting pressure on Ottawa to intervene. The construction of new pipelines will reduce demand for hitherto-booming rail transport for crude. Canada will remain heavily reliant on the US market for its crude, a potential risk if Washington follows through on its trade talk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207