Pose Tracking Control for Spacecraft Proximity Operations Using the Udwadia-Kalaba Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis develops an analytical dynamics-based approach for simultaneous position and orientation tracking control of a chaser spacecraft with respect to an uncontrolled target spacecraft. The control requirements are formulated as holonomic or nonholonomic constraints, which are differentiated to obtain a constraint equation linear in acceleration. Exact real-time control forces are then generated by substituting the control constraints into the Udwadia-Kalaba equation. Three major contributions are presented. Firstly, the complete six-degree-of-freedom formulation of the Udwadia-Kalaba based pose tracking controller is presented. Simulations demonstrate the achievement of the desired objectives in space. Subsequently, a planar pose tracking controller is formulated for both a single and dual chaser configuration. Simulation results highlight the planar position and orientation synchronization with respect to a spinning target. Finally, the controller is experimentally validated in the Spacecraft Proximity Operations Testbed at Carleton University. Results show that the pose tracking control objective is achieved. iii My deepest gratitude goes to my Prof. Steve Ulrich who, through his experience and focused
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".