MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introducción

2019· article· es· W4251369451 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Chatelan, Gilles Routhier, Caroline Sappia

Bibliographic record

VenueChrétiens et sociétés/Chrétiens et sociétés XVIe-XXIe siècles · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las "organizaciones para el envío de sacerdotes Fidei donum a América Latina": ¿qué significa esto? Se trata de un curioso objeto de investigación, casi un "OVNI" historiográfico, que podría fácilmente sospecharse que es un poco anticuado, típico de una historia clerical sobre la que la investigación francófona se ha construido durante varias décadas y a priori de un interés muy secundario en la historia del hecho religioso contemporáneo. La ambición de esta guía es demostrar que este no es e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChrétiens et sociétés/Chrétiens et sociétés XVIe-XXIe sièclesSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207