MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introducción

2019· article· es· W4251369451 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Chatelan, Gilles Routhier, Caroline Sappia

Bibliographic record

VenueChrétiens et sociétés/Chrétiens et sociétés XVIe-XXIe siècles · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las "organizaciones para el envío de sacerdotes Fidei donum a América Latina": ¿qué significa esto? Se trata de un curioso objeto de investigación, casi un "OVNI" historiográfico, que podría fácilmente sospecharse que es un poco anticuado, típico de una historia clerical sobre la que la investigación francófona se ha construido durante varias décadas y a priori de un interés muy secundario en la historia del hecho religioso contemporáneo. La ambición de esta guía es demostrar que este no es e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2900.101

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChrétiens et sociétés/Chrétiens et sociétés XVIe-XXIe sièclesSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207