MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4251394896 · doi:10.21203/rs.2.22446/v1

Changes in the geomagnetic field has little effect on the overwintering range of Eastern North American fall migratory monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), indicating a lack of an innate magnetic map sense for navigation

2020· preprint· en· W4251394896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick A. Guerra, Stephen F. Matter

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverwinteringDanausMonarch butterflyEarth's magnetic fieldRange (aeronautics)GeographyEcologyBiologyPhysicsLepidoptera genitaliaMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BackgroundIndividuals of many species that perform annual long-distance migrations are capable of stopping at specific overwintering destinations, despite having not been there before. The iconic monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) and its annual long-distance fall migration is a famous example of this phenomenon. During the fall, Eastern North American monarch butterflies use various compass mechanisms to properly orient their flight southwards, in order to leave their summer breeding grounds in Southern Canada and the Northern United States, and reach their overwintering sites in Central Mexico. It remains a mystery, however, how monarchs locate and stop at these specific, consistent overwintering sites, especially since these individuals are on their maiden voyage. MethodsWe test the hypothesis that fall migrant monarchs locate these overwintering sites by using an innate, inherited map sense based on sensing and responding to specific geomagnetic signatures that are correlated with the overwintering sites. Using a natural displacement approach, we examined if the locations of overwintering sites and the abundance of monarchs at them, changes with the natural shift of the Earth’s magnetic field over time (2004-2018).ResultsWe found that despite the natural displacement of the geomagnetic field over the years, the locations of the overwintering sites and monarch abundance were unaffected. For example, fall monarchs continued to overwinter at the most southern sites in Mexico, even when the geomagnetic coordinates associated with these sites would have shifted north due to the natural shift of the Earth’s magnetic field, placing these sites significantly outside the range of the overwintering area.ConclusionsOur results suggest that monarchs do not employ a map sense based on geomagnetic cues for finding their overwintering sites, and might instead use other mechanisms or strategies for locating them (potentially using localized sensory cues) once they are near or have arrived in Central Mexico. We suggest that future work should now focus on understanding what these cue parameters are, in order to inform conservation efforts that are aimed at protecting the threatened monarch butterfly and preserving its annual long-distance migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→