MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251397238 · doi:10.36884/jafm.9.si2.25789

1D Steady-State Numerical Results for Critical Two-Phase Flow – Critical Location and Pressure Profiles

2016· article· en· W4251397238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Fluid Mechanics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeHydro-Québec
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Electronics Technology Group CorporationFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMechanicsSteady state (chemistry)Flow (mathematics)Phase (matter)GeologyPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of two-phase ejectors to improve refrigeration systems encounters today a great interest. However, modeling of such devices with low void fraction at the entrance of the motive nozzle, presents significant challenges. The choking conditions and the discontinuities appearing in a two-phase flow in a nozzle are not well documented and some works are needed to better anticipated flow behavior under these conditions. This paper presents a steady state two-phase flow model including new choking criterions for one-dimensional conservative systems. The present model is a two-fluid, one pressure model with thermal equilibrium and mechanical disequilibrium. As a first step, this model is used to study the flow in the motive nozzle of an ejector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it