MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251440609 · doi:10.1049/pbte095e_ch21

Demonstration of high-speed pixelated acquisition and tracking system for optical intersatellite links

2021· book-chapter· en· W4251440609 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree-space optical communicationConstellationBackplaneElectronicsRelayOptical communicationTracking (education)TransceiverComputer scienceEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple emerging small satellite constellations aim to provide worldwide connectivity through high-speed free-space optical communication across many thousands of kilometers. The scale of these constellations requires a new approach to the design, build, and verification of high-performance space optics, one that will focus on mass-producibility, low-cost design, and limited touch-time. Honeywell and our partners have developed an optical intersatellite terminal that builds on our combined decades of experience in reliable space optics, electronics, and mass production of space hardware. The critical technical drivers of optical systems for space are their susceptibility to the thermal and radiation environments. The system is designed around Honeywell's Optical Pointing and Tracking Relay Assembly for Communications (OPTRAC), a low-cost subsystem which is designed to drive all of Honeywell's optical link products by providing a common interface between swappable front-end telescopes and back-end optical transceivers. The lowest-cost traditional approach to performing pointing and tracking is to apply quadrant photodiode sensors. These large-area devices have limited sensitivity and must maintain tight alignment tolerances over temperature. This chapter discusses the advantages and impacts of tracking with a pixelated sensor and presents results of laboratory testing and environmental qualification of a pixelated prototype subsystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooksSame topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207