MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4251462440 · doi:10.15173/mjc.v5i0.2077

Preface

2019· article· en· W4251462440 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Morgan Harper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe McMaster Journal of Communication · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PrefaceVolume 5, Innovation and Enterprise within a Communication sphere (2008) ver the course of the last year there have been many changes made to the McMaster Journal of Communication and I would foremost like to welcome you to the new website.We have updated the content and look of the site, giving it a much more collegiate feel, representing both McMaster and the combined Communication Studies and Multimedia program.There is now greater ease of access to all the back issues from Volume 1 through to 5, as well as a more professional layout and design template.This year's theme focused on "Innovation and Enterprise within a Communication sphere" and has highlighted some of the fabulous work done by the students here at McMaster.Our first article draws on Marshall McLuhan's international village and the social networking site Facebook in a unique look at international Facebook "friends."Nathan Nash looks at the link between social media and the global village, concluding that while social networks have brought about some interesting trends in the use of the internet there are important aspects of the global village that it does not speak to.Our second article titled "Television Study: "Gossip Girl" and It's Affects on Viewer's Fashion" looks at the impact of costuming on the CW network's popular teen drama "Gossip Girl" and its effects on viewer's personal fashion choices.Marie Romeo explores this theme through a content analysis using three independent coders to discover if wardrobe is a predominant aspect of Gossip Girl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5220.347

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe McMaster Journal of Communication→French-language works237,207→