MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A<scp>IRCRAFT</scp> I<scp>CING</scp>

2002· article· en· W4251485344 on OpenAlexaff
Tuncer Cebeci, F. Kafyeke

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Fluid Mechanics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcingIce creamEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMeteorologyPhysicsFood scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

▪ Abstract Full-scale icing experiments and, therefore, certification time and cost can be significantly reduced by developing calculation methods to evaluate the aircraft and system performance for a wide range of icing conditions. This article summarizes calculation methods for icing that include ice accretion, ice system performance, and icing effects on aircraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1470.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations243
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of Fluid MechanicsSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207